Samsung X150 vs Oppo Reno 11F
VS
BOppo
Reno 11F
Rs 84,999
What matters to you?
Set how much each area matters. The verdict updates as you go.
Memory & chipnot scored
Cameranot scored
Display
Battery
Build
Connectivitynot scored
Pricenot scored
Best for you
Oppo Reno 11F
Wins Battery, which you rated High.
Your priorityWeightWinner
CameraHighNot scored
BatteryHighReno 11F +84
Memory & chipMedNot scored
DisplayMedReno 11F +78
PriceMedNot scored
BuildLowX150 +61
ConnectivityLowNot scored
Samsung X1500% match
Oppo Reno 11F0% match
Scores compare these two phones against each other, from their listed specs, based on the 3 of 7 areas both phones list.
Round by round
Open any round to see the full specs behind the score.
Main
—
Triple Camera: 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF + 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, (ultrawide), 1/4.0" + 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro), LED Flash
Front
—
32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74, Panorama, Video (4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS)
Features
—
HDR, panorama, Video (4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS)
In your hand
Both outlines drawn to the same scale from the listed dimensions.
X150Reno 11F
Height85 mm161.1 mm
Width44 mm74.7 mm
Thickness20 mm7.5 mm
Weight69 g177 g
Samsung X150 is 108 g lighter.
Full spec sheet
Every listed spec side by side. Jump to a section or scroll through.
SpecSamsung X150 No price listedOppo Reno 11F Rs 84,999
Display7 differencesOppo Reno 11F leads
Size
1.5 inches
6.7 Inches (better)
Resolution
128 x 160 pixels
1080 x 2412 Pixels (~394 PPI)
Type
CSTN, 65K colors
—
Screen-to-body ratio
~18.9 %
—
Technology
—
AMOLED Capacitive Touchscreen, 1B, Multitouch
Protection
—
Panda Glass
Extra Features
—
120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM), 1100 nits (peak)
Network5 differences
Technology
GSM
—
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800
—
GPRS
No
—
EDGE
No
—
Launched Year
—
2024
Body4 differencesSamsung X150 leads
Dimensions
85 x 44 x 20 mm
—
Weight
69 g (better)
185 g
SIM
Mini-SIM
—
Colors
Black
—
Memory3 differences
Card slot
No
—
Built-in
—
256GB Built-in, 8GB RAM, UFS 3.1
Card
—
microSDXC
Battery2 differencesOppo Reno 11F leads
Type
Removable Li-Ion
—
Capacity
800 mAh
(Non removable), 5000 mAh (better)
Connectivity7 differences
Bluetooth
No
v5.2 with A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC
WLAN
No
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band
GPS
No
Yes + GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
NFC
No
Yes
Radio
No
—
USB
No
USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
Data
—
GPRS , Edge, 3G HSPA, 4G LTE, 5G capable
Sound2 differences
Loudspeaker
No
—
3.5mm jack
No
—
Build6 differencesSamsung X150 leads
OS
—
Android 14 OS
UI
—
ColorOS 14
Dimensions
—
161.1 x 74.7 x 7.5 mm
Weight
— (better)
177 g
SIM
—
Dual Sim, Dual Standby (Nano-SIM)
Colors
—
Palm Green, Ocean Blue, Coral Purple
Frequency3 differences
2G Band
—
SIM1: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM2: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G Band
—
HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G Band
—
LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 17(700), 20(800), 34(2000), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500)
Processor3 differences
CPU
—
Octa-core (2 x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6 x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset
—
Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
GPU
—
Mali-G68 MP4
Camera3 differences
Main
—
Triple Camera: 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF + 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, (ultrawide), 1/4.0" + 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro), LED Flash
Features
—
HDR, panorama, Video (4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS)
Front
—
32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74, Panorama, Video (4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS)
Features7 differences
Sensors
—
Accelerometer, Compass, Fingerprint (under display, optical), Gyro, Proximity
Audio
—
24-bit/192kHz audio, Speaker Phone
Browser
—
HTML5
Messaging
—
SMS(threaded view), MMS, Email, Push Mail, IM
Games
—
Built-in + Downloadable
Torch
—
Yes
Extra
—
Glass front, plastic frame, glass back, Document editor, Photo/video editor